Welcome to the Industrial Automation website!

NameDescriptionContent
XING-Automation
E-mail  
Password  
  
Forgot password?
  Register
当前位置:

How big is the Red Sea crisis for the global economy?

F: | Au:佚名 | DA:2023-12-25 | 689 Br: | 🔊 点击朗读正文 ❚❚ | Share:

Recently, the Red Sea has been in the spotlight. The frequent attacks by Yemen's Houthi armed forces on merchant ships "linked to Israel" in the Red Sea region have not only forced a number of shipping giants around the world to divert, triggering concerns about the stability of international shipping and the global supply chain. How important are the Red Sea lanes? What will be the impact on the global economy?

Detour to the Cape of Good Hope

International giants suspend Red Sea routes

The Red Sea is located between northeast Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, connecting the Mediterranean Sea through the Suez Canal in the north, connecting the Gulf of Aden through the Mandeb Strait in the south, guarding the traffic arteries of Asia, Africa and Europe, and is the only way for ships to and from the Atlantic Ocean (4.020, -0.04, -0.99%) and the Indian Ocean. It is also known as one of the busiest, most important and most controversial waterways in the world.

Now, a global shipping crisis is unfolding here.

Due to the intensive attacks by the Houthi armed forces on a number of merchant ships passing through the Red Sea Mander Strait to Israel, local time on December 15 to 16, including Swiss Mediterranean, Denmark Maersk, France's CMA, Germany and other global shipping giants announced to avoid the Red Sea route. Energy giants such as BP also pressed the "pause button" on oil tanker traffic in the Red Sea on Wednesday.

On December 20, the reporter learned from the world's largest maritime freight forwarder Kuexun Group that some ships of a number of shipping companies have chosen to detour the Cape of Good Hope, including Mediterranean Shipping, Masky, COSCO Shipping, Orient Overseas, Hapal-Lloyd, CMA, ONE, Hyundai Merchant Marine, Wanhai, Yangming Shipping, Nile Shipping, the President of the United States and so on.

Some freight forwarders told reporters on the 20th that they had received customer notices from shipping companies including Hapag-Lloyd and Evergreen Shipping in the past two days, announcing that they had changed from the original suspension of the Red Sea voyage to the Cape of Good Hope.

On the 20th, Maersk, the world's second largest shipping company by capacity, told reporters that for safety reasons, all ships that had previously suspended sailing and passing through the Red Sea region will now bypass Africa via the Cape of Good Hope. These vessels will continue to sail on the detour route based on practical operational feasibility. Maersk will be in touch with affected customers to provide more details.

As of Dec. 18, Maersk had about 20 vessels suspended from passing through the region, with half of them waiting east of the Gulf of Aden and the rest in the Red Sea south of Suez or the Mediterranean north of Suez.

Evergreen Shipping announced on December 20 that based on the safety inspection of cargo, ship and crew, Evergreen Shipping temporarily stopped receiving Israeli cargo and suspended the passage of Red Sea from now on. Vessels of the Red Sea regional route will sail to the surrounding safe waters to wait for notification, and evaluate whether to adjust the port of call according to the subsequent situation development; Ships on Asian routes to and from the Mediterranean, Europe and the east coast of the United States, which were supposed to pass through the Red Sea, will be diverted around the Cape of Good Hope on the southern tip of Africa to their destination ports.

Hapault also said that the situation around the Red Sea/Suez Canal was unsafe and the crew on board were at great risk, so it was immediately decided to avoid the Suez Canal and the Red Sea, to divert the ship around the Cape of Good Hope, and that the situation in the Red Sea would be reassessed regularly.

As the situation in the Red Sea remains unstable, more shipping companies are expected to join the "detours".

Rate increase

The offer in early January has doubled compared to the end of December

For international shipping companies that have suspended Red Sea routes, the best option is to re-route through the Cape of Good Hope, the southernmost tip of Africa.

According to energy intelligence agency Vortexa, if merchant vessels seek alternative routes, such as a detour around Africa's Cape of Good Hope, the journey time on major routes from the Middle East to Europe and from India to Europe would increase by 58 to 129 percent. The biggest increase in the time it takes for goods to reach their destination was on the Middle East Gulf to Mediterranean route, which increased by 129% from 17 days to 39 days.

Citic Futures also pointed out that the rerouting of cargo ships will increase the sailing time from the Far East to Northwest Europe by about 9 days, increase the time of a voyage by about 18 days, and reduce the turnover efficiency of ships by about 19%.

By adopting the detour scheme, the transport distance of ships and the transport market have increased significantly, and the turnover efficiency of ships has decreased, resulting in the shortage of shipping capacity on the Asia-Europe route in the short term.

Based on this, shipping companies have announced surcharges, with global shipping companies such as Maersk, MSC, CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd all saying they would impose additional charges on ships diverted by the Red Sea ship attacks. These include Transport Disruption Surcharge (TDS), Red Sea Surcharge (RSC), Emergency Operations Surcharge (EOS), Operations Recovery Surcharge (OCR), Peak season Surcharge (PSS) and more.

Maersk said it expects a total additional charge of $700 for a 20-foot standard container shipped from China to Northern Europe, including $200 for TDS and $500 for PSS, and $500 for each standard container shipped to the east coast of North America. This includes a $200 TDS payment and a $300 PSS.

Recently, a number of freight forwarders told reporters that they have received updates from a number of shipping companies on the spot market rates, and the rates of many European routes and Mediterranean routes in early January next year have doubled compared with the end of December.

In addition, ships that still sail through the Red Sea need to buy more expensive insurance. It is understood that the insurance market estimates that the war risk rate has increased from 0.07% to 0.1% to 0.2%. The increase in time, fuel, insurance and other costs will inevitably lead to higher freight costs. Xia Haofei, founder of Jian Yi Yun, told reporters that the result of the initial communication of the liner company is that the freight rate of the European route rose from 1500 US dollars/container to 3500 US dollars/container in mid-January.

In addition, MSC, the world's largest liner company, announced that from January 1, 2024, the freight rate on the Mediterranean route will be adjusted to $5,000 per container. Industry insiders believe that this shows that the market has a strong expectation of rising shipping costs, and some industry analysts such as Xeneta even believe that Asia-Europe route freight rates may rise by 100%.

While freight prices are rising, energy prices are also rising.

Currently, about a fifth of the traffic through the Suez Canal is oil, either by ship or through the Sumed pipeline to Egypt, with crude oil and refined products transported in both ways totaling nearly 9 million barrels per day, or about 12 percent of total seaborne trade. Recently, as the situation in the Red Sea heats up, the European natural gas price, which has fallen for more than a year, has rebounded, and the European natural gas futures rose 13%; International oil prices, which fell for two months in a row, also began to rebound.

The cost of food and clothing is increasing

'No respite' for global inflation

It is worth noting that the situation in the Red Sea has also triggered a series of spillover effects.

The Red Sea is one of the important shipping lanes connecting Asia and Europe, and many commodities, such as oil, gas, chemical products, metal ores, grain, etc., are transported through this waterway. Therefore, the Red Sea shipping security incident will also have a certain impact on the transportation and prices of some commodities.

Taking the electric vehicle transport industry as an example, there are media reports that in view of the increased tensions in the Red Sea, Tesla electric vehicles from China to Europe by sea have chosen an alternative route, namely a detour of the Cape of Good Hope. It is reported that with the extension of the route, the transportation cost of electric vehicles will increase by about 20%. Xia Haofei said that from the point of view of China's exports to Europe, in addition to new energy vehicles, there are a large part of electronic products, clothing, toys and other goods, the added value of these goods is not high, so the high probability will choose a detour.

In addition, according to sources quoted by the media, if the Red Sea tensions do not improve, India may consider an alternative route to ship Basmati rice (also known as basmati rice) along Africa, which could increase prices by about 15 to 20 percent. The route is also likely to affect India's exports of long-grain rice to Egypt and Europe.

Finally, almost all of these price changes are reflected in the cost of food and clothing, and there is "no respite" for global inflation.

The sudden disruption to global supply chains creates uncertainty at a time when the world's major central banks are considering normalizing monetary policy. There are comments that if the shipping disruption is only brief, consumers may not feel it significantly, except for a slight increase in gasoline prices. If this continues for a longer period, inflation could rise again in the first month of 2024.


  • Inovance H3U-3624MT PLC Controller
  • Inovance AM600-CPU1608TP PLC Module
  • Omron NS8-TV00B-V2 NS8-TV00B-ECV2 HMI
  • Phoenix ILC 151 ETH PLC Module
  • National Instruments NI-9242 Analog Input Module
  • Fanuc A16B-3200-0521 Main Board
  • NLT NL8060BC26-35F 10.4 LCD Screen
  • Pilz PSEN cs1.1P 540050 Safety Switch
  • Keyence VT-SW4 VT-7SR Touch Panel
  • Siemens 6ES7 131-1BL11-0XB0 Digital Input Module
  • Mitsubishi RJ71EIP91 Ethernet IP Module
  • Siemens 3RW4047-1BB14 Soft Starter 55kW
  • Mitsubishi AJ71C21-A PLC Programmable Controller
  • NL8060BC21-06 8.4 Inch LCD Module
  • Siemens 6ES7215-1HG40-0XB0 PLC S7-1200
  • Siemens 3VA2463-5HL32-0AA0 630A Breaker
  • Saginomiya E-UJ-44030-B Control Board
  • Schmersal MV10H330-11y-M20-1348 Safety Switch
  • Fanuc A16B-1211-0301-04A Control Board
  • Siemens 6SN1123-1AB00-0AA2 LT Module
  • A100005506 Compair Delcos 3100 Control Panel
  • Omron ZFV-CA40 Smart Sensor Amplifier
  • Fanuc A16B-2200-0660 I O Board
  • Omron CJ1W-NC471 Position Control Unit
  • Siemens 6SN1112-1AA00-0AA0 Simodrive PWM Module
  • Mitsubishi GT2708 HMI Touch Panel
  • Siemens 3TK2834-1BB40 Safety Switch
  • INSYS EBW-E100 Industrial Ethernet Router
  • Schneider LC1F400 Contactor TeSys F
  • Mitsui RYP-51 PCB Control Board
  • Tamagawa TS2620N941E172 Encoder
  • Pilz PZE 9 Safety Relay
  • Omron C1000H-CPU01-V1 PLC
  • Siemens 6SL3210-1KE21-3UP1 Frequency Converter
  • Allen-Bradley 440E-L22BNSM Rope Pull Switch
  • ABB CI868K01 Interface Module
  • Stein Sohn E 083.1 PLC Rack
  • Mitsubishi GT2508-VTBD GT2508-VTBA HMI
  • ABB 3BSE018161R1 Module
  • CAREL ASD100 PGD1AY0I00 Operation Panel
  • ABB EK370-40-11 Contactor 220-230V
  • Eaton 9PX1500IRTM UPS 1500VA
  • NCV-20NGNMP Programmable Controller
  • Mitsubishi LE-40MTA-E Tension Controller
  • Fanuc A16B-3200-0429 Control Board
  • Mitsubishi GT2310-VTBA HMI Touch Screen
  • 3A99184G 1C31170G PCB Module Rev 10
  • Schneider 140NOM25200 Modicon Quantum Adapter
  • Mitsubishi NV400-SW 400A Circuit Breaker
  • Applied Materials 0190-51102 Heater Controller
  • Omron C200H-DA003 Analog Output Module
  • Yaskawa JANCD-YCP21-E DX200 CPU Board
  • IAI 12G2-60-250-P-L-C1-SP Intelligent Actuator
  • NLT NL8060BC21-11 8.4 LCD Screen
  • Omron NX502-1300 Controller Unit
  • ABB RVT-6 Power Factor Controller
  • Schneider TM258LF66DT4L PLC Controller
  • NLT NL6448BC26-27D 8.4 LCD Panel
  • NLT NL8060BC21-09 8.4 LCD Screen
  • Keyence XG-8700L Multi-camera Imaging System
  • EPC 50 3183045486 I O Motherboard
  • Nidec Emerson M701-054-00270A CT Drive
  • Therma Wave 18-011040 Controller Assembly
  • Mitsubishi Q03UDECPU PLC CPU Module
  • Allen-Bradley 2002-NX70-MWLINK PLC Module
  • AS-2P-60M-B Industrial PLC Cable
  • Yaskawa JANCD-YCP21-E DX200 CPU Board
  • PASABAN MC-2006 03 CAN PLC Card
  • Mitsubishi RJ71PB91V PROFIBUS DP Module
  • Fanuc A20B-8100-0137 PCB I O Board
  • D0-06DD2-D PLC Module DL06 PLC
  • Kepco BOP100-4M Power Supply Amplifier
  • Allen-Bradley 1785-L60B PLC-5 60 Module
  • Siemens 7MH4900-3AA01 Weighing Module
  • Pilz 773100 PNOZ m1p Safety Controller
  • Omron NS12-TS00B-V2 Graphic Operation Panel
  • EC20-4040BTA Programmable Controller PLC
  • Fanuc A16B-1212-0100-01 Power Unit CNC
  • Siemens 6ES7151-3BB23-0AB0 ET200S Interface Module
  • ATTO Control DU-01 PLC Display System
  • Keyence KV-RC8BXR Programmable Controller
  • Lenze GST04-1GVCK-063C22 Servo Motor
  • CKD AX9000GH AX9210H Control Unit
  • ABB PG6310 DC Trigger Control Board
  • Cutler Hammer 10316H621C Type L Device
  • TAIYO AA-277 EM CY TRIP PCB Card
  • Schneider BMXCPS2010 PLC Power Supply
  • Schneider TSXMRPC007M PLC PCMCIA Card
  • 101182218 Safety Stop Relay SSW301HV-230V
  • Cutler Hammer 9-1875-3 Size 6 Contactor 480V
  • Nidec UNI3401 Drive Module Control Board
  • Delta AS06XA-A PLC Module Analog Mixed IO
  • Lenze EPL 10201 13408978 Servo Drive 24V DC
  • Sigmatek CCP612-K PLC Module DI DO Module
  • Schneider ATS48D38Q Soft Starter Altistart 48
  • Fanuc A20B-3300-0472 Main CPU Board Series 30i
  • Mitsubishi A171SCPU-S3 Servo CPU Module PLC
  • ABB 1SFL597001R7011 700A 100-250V Soft Starter
  • Yaskawa JANCD-YCP21-E DX200 CPU Control Board
  • Schneider NS630N Circuit Breaker 3P 630A
  • Honeywell DPCB21010002 Rack Slot PCB
  • Mitsubishi RJ71EIP91 PLC Module
  • Siemens 3VL5763-1DC36-0AA0 Circuit Breaker
  • Siemens 6GK7542-1AX00-0XE0 Communication Module
  • Siemens 6SL3130-6AE15-0AB1 Smart Line Module
  • HMS Anybus AB7646-F Gateway
  • Honeywell 621-0020 Analog Input Module
  • Siemens 6ES7212-1HF40-0XB0 PLC Controller
  • MAK 1.00.7-36.21.00-40 PCB Module
  • ABB 3BSE006503R1 PFSA140 Power Supply
  • SAACKE F-GDSA 143303 Burner Controller
  • ABB PFSC230 25m Cable Set
  • GE HYDRAN 201Ci-1 Controller
  • ABB NINT-42C main circuit interface board
  • B&R 3AT660 6 Thermocouple Input Module
  • Honeywell EC7850A1080 Programmable Logic Controller
  • Mitsubishi A2ACPU21 CPU Module MELSEC A Series
  • Mitsubishi R60ADH3FR Analog Input Module iQ R
  • ELMO WLWHIA20 100 Servo Drive Whistle Series
  • Omron CJ1W-MAD42 Analog I O Module PLC
  • Siemens A5E03894525 SINAMICS S120 Power Module
  • Omron K3HB-HTA-DRT1 Temperature Panel Meter
  • Keyence KV-8000SO Programmable Controller CPU Unit
  • Harris 8800-00002-02 PLC Power Control Center
  • Siemens 3TY7480-0A Auxiliary Contact Block
  • Omron 3G3MX2-AB022-ZV1 Inverter
  • ABB ACS380-040S-12A6-4 VFD
  • ATTO controlSYS ATTO-CPU44 PLC System