The big "change" bureau of biomass power generation industry

Second, technological upgrading. With the current technology, it is increasingly difficult to reduce costs. For example, under the current domestic mainstream process technology route, a two-furnace two-machine waste incineration power generation project needs 70 or 80 people no matter how careful the budget, while Western European countries of the same scale only need about half of the people. Although there is a difference in management level, but more important is the difference in technology. Therefore, in order to further reduce costs and increase efficiency, enterprises will pay more and more attention to the improvement of technology.

The third is vertical extension. On the one hand, the New Deal will force enterprises to extend the value chain, the most important thing is to have their own general contracting qualifications and capabilities, after all, the reasonable use of policies to earn project profits will greatly increase the return level of the whole life cycle of the project. On the other hand, enterprises will extend the industrial chain upstream, such as the expansion of the whole chain from waste incineration to waste "collection - storage - transportation - sales", in order to partially disperse the profit risk of a certain link.

Fourth, horizontal extension. In fact, this is already a common choice for industry enterprises, from agricultural and forestry biomass power generation, waste incineration power generation to a broader field of solid waste expansion, such as kitchen, general industrial solid waste, hazardous waste, resource recycling and so on.

To sum up, from the perspective of a third party, the author believes that the policy itself is still conducive to promoting the overall standardized, healthy and orderly development of the industry, but objectively it will indeed cause some difficulties to the industry, which is worthy of careful study and proper response by all participants.