The New Deal forced biomass power generation innovation business model

However, Li Shaofu believes that unlike wind power and photovoltaic power generation projects, biomass power generation has strong public service attributes and is just needed products in the process of environmental governance, and the payment subject is fuzzy before the "polluter pays" system is fully implemented, which is difficult to fully realize the marketization.

Guo Yungao said that biomass power generation projects should take into account the environmental benefits, and it is difficult to achieve marketization in a short time.

In addition, the "Implementation Plan" proposes to encourage provinces (regions and municipalities) with the conditions to explore market-oriented operation pilots of biomass power generation projects, improve supporting safeguards, and gradually form a market-oriented operation model.

Force the industry to innovate and develop

Industry insiders believe that the introduction of the Implementation Plan aims to bring changes in the technical model and business model of industry enterprises through the adjustment of policies.

Guo Yungao said that with the gradual withdrawal of the electricity price subsidy mechanism, the biomass power generation industry should explore the operation model that does not rely on subsidies, and take diversified, non-electricity and high value-added utilization routes. For example, agricultural and forestry biomass power generation, waste incineration power generation, biogas power generation and so on.

The "implementation plan" also proposed that based on diversified energy needs, vigorously promote agricultural and forestry biomass cogeneration, strictly control only power generation and not heating projects, adhere to appropriate gas, appropriate heat, appropriate electricity, encourage to accelerate the application of biomass energy in non-electrical fields, improve project economy and product added value, reduce power generation costs, and reduce subsidy dependence.

At the same time, it will force industry enterprises to innovate and develop and technological progress, and those industry enterprises that work hard to practice internal skills and reduce costs will benefit from policy adjustments. For example, enterprises with independent core equipment, enterprises that continue to carry out technology research and development, and enterprises that extend the industrial chain.