Welcome to the Industrial Automation website!

NameDescriptionContent
XING-Automation
E-mail  
Password  
  
Forgot password?
  Register
当前位置:

Green ship low carbon development trend

F: | Au:佚名 | DA:2023-12-04 | 1227 Br: | 🔊 点击朗读正文 ❚❚ | Share:

90% of global trade is completed by sea, and the environmental pollution caused by ship shipping has been highly concerned by the international community. International conventions and related planning documents regulating environmental pollution and consumption reduction of ships have been issued successively, and standards and norms are increasingly stringent. Green and low-carbon has become an inevitable trend in the development of the ship shipping industry.

The research team of Academician Lin Zhongqin of the Chinese Academy of Engineering published the "Low-carbon Development Trend and Countermeasures of Green Ships" in the 6th issue of 2020 of the journal of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, "China Engineering Science". Based on the analysis of the preliminary carbon emission reduction strategy of the International Maritime Organization, the development status of Norway, Japan and the United Kingdom in the field of green ships was expounded. This paper summarizes the common advantages of foreign countries in promoting the development of green ships in terms of policy guidance, technical direction and international cooperation. Based on the development situation of domestic green ships, this paper puts forward suggestions on the development of green ships in China from three aspects: strengthening government leadership, formulating green ship development plans at the national and industry levels, laying out technical research, accelerating the market-oriented application process of ship alternative fuels, implementing open cooperation, and leading the development of international industries while enhancing core competitiveness.

I. Introduction

Since the beginning of the 21st century, the environmental problems brought about by the growth of the world economy have become increasingly serious. The international community has continued to pay attention to environmental pollution and protection issues, and the requirements for low-carbon environmental protection in various industries have also been increasing. A series of new international conventions, new rules and new standards have emerged, such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which aims to comprehensively control greenhouse gas emissions and address global warming. The Paris Agreement on arrangements for action to combat global climate change. The State of the Global Climate 2019 Statement by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) confirms that the global climate continues to warm, with a series of chain reactions that are intensifying and moving further away from achieving the temperature control goals of the Paris Agreement. According to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, it will take political will and urgent action by all countries in the world to achieve a 45% reduction in emissions by 2030 (compared to 2008) and zero emissions by 2050 [1].

90% of global trade is completed by sea, and the environmental pollution caused by ship shipping has been highly concerned by the international community. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has been developing and issuing mandatory regulations to prevent ships from polluting the environment. In this context, the concept of green environmental protection came into being and was gradually accepted and recognized by the shipping industry, and the mode of green development of ships began to be deeply explored and explored. In this context, the concept of "green ship" is gradually clear, and the academic circle has more and more extensive and in-depth discussion on it. China Classification Society's definition of green ships has been widely recognized in China: green ships adopt relatively advanced technologies to safely meet predetermined functions and performance during their life cycle, while achieving improved energy efficiency, reducing or eliminating environmental pollution, and providing good protection to operators and users [2]. Although the academic community has not reached a complete agreement on the definition of the concept of green ships, it basically reflects the core meaning of the principle of green environmental protection, energy saving and emission reduction in the whole life cycle of ship construction and application, supported by advanced technology and new energy fuel development, and aimed at reducing and even eliminating environmental pollution.

In order to enhance the competitiveness of the industry, the world's major shipbuilding countries have actively formulated green ship development plans and carried out research on green ship technology. Since 1990, China has carried out relevant research on green ship technology, and has made some achievements in the research and development of high-efficiency and energy-saving ship types and hull construction. In order to better fulfill the international commitments on energy conservation and emission reduction, and accelerate the transformation and upgrading from a shipbuilding power to a shipbuilding power, China should seize the key window period for the development of green ships, and carry out planning and layout for the market-oriented operation of green ships as soon as possible. Based on the analysis of IMO carbon emission reduction strategy and the development of green ships abroad, this paper focuses on the ways to improve ship energy efficiency and accelerate domestic market application of green ships through carbon emission reduction.

Imo's carbon reduction strategy

IMO has been committed to promoting the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the shipping industry, and has listed the reduction of carbon emissions from ships as a key management measure. In order to promote the international shipping industry to achieve emission reduction targets as soon as possible, IMO adopted the Ship Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) in 2011 as the main means to control greenhouse gas emissions from ships, with a view to regulating the process of low-carbon emissions in the shipping and shipping industry. In 2018, the Preliminary Strategy for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships was adopted, which makes overall arrangements for the actions of the shipping industry to address climate change in terms of vision objectives, emission reduction efforts, guiding principles, emission reduction measures and impacts at different stages (see Figure 1) [3,4]. This is not only the first greenhouse gas emission reduction strategy formulated by the global shipping industry in response to climate change, but also an important milestone in IMO's negotiation process of greenhouse gas emission reduction in shipping [5].

The above strategy defines the quantified targets of greenhouse gas emission reduction and the phased emission reduction measures. Average CO2 emissions per unit of transport activity from international shipping should be reduced by at least 40% by 2030 compared to 2008, and by 70% by 2050. (2) Reduce total annual greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008. In order to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping as soon as possible, three phases of measures have been developed: first, short-term measures (2018-2023), improve the technical and operational efficiency of new and existing ships, and initiate research and development of new technologies such as alternative fuels; Second, medium-term measures (2023-2030), including the introduction of alternative low-carbon and zero-carbon fuel implementation plans, and strengthening technical cooperation and capacity building; The third is long-term measures (beyond 2030), introducing zero-carbon fuels and encouraging the widespread adoption of possible new emission reduction mechanisms.

According to the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), the development of globally available and safe new Marine energy sources may face significant implementation barriers, such as the need to develop fuel life cycle GHG/carbon intensity guidelines in order to introduce alternative fuels. The IMO has developed safety standards for ships fuelled by LNG in the International Safety Code for Ships Using Gas or Other Low Flash Point Fuels, but has not yet developed safety standards for ships using hydrogen or other fuels. MEPC said it will promote public-private partnerships and information exchange by promoting information sharing, technology transfer and cooperation to help promote the development of low-carbon technologies and accelerate the transition of ships to low-carbon and zero-carbon fuels.

After the game and balance of the interests of all parties, the IMO's initial strategy on ship carbon reduction will be officially transformed into a final strategy in 2023, and changes in relevant international rules will determine the development direction of the shipping industry. This is bound to have a major impact on the formulation of energy conservation and emission reduction policies in China, and the phased goals and measures of energy conservation and emission reduction in the shipping industry also need to be adjusted accordingly. International norms and emerging technologies will become important factors affecting the future clean and low-carbon development of the shipping industry, and with the establishment of IMO's final environmental protection expected rules and standards, new opportunities for ship and shipping investment development will also follow.

Third, foreign green ship development planning and inspiration

Under the "forced" by a series of strict environmental protection conventions and standards of international organizations, Europe and Japan have formulated national green ship development plans and measures to speed up the research and promotion of new energy, new technology and new materials in the field of green ships, in order to support the domestic shipbuilding and shipping industry to meet the provisions of international environmental protection conventions as soon as possible. Win a new round of competitive advantage in the shipping and shipping market [6].

(I) Norway

As a global leader in green transformation in shipping, Norway's government aims to reduce the carbon emissions of domestic shipping and fishing vessels by 50% by 2030, and continue to promote the low-carbon emission reduction of all types of vessels through legislative planning, financial support, government-enterprise cooperation, quota system, public procurement emission reduction, registration incentive mechanism and other means. Accelerate the green development of the shipping industry [7].

The government introduced relevant legislation and formulated development plans. The Norwegian government is working to promote a climate - and environment-friendly international institutional framework for the shipping industry: the Ship Safety and Regulation Act covers environmental safety and environmental requirements related to the construction, equipment and operation of ships; The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships has been applied in Norway's domestic legal system to regulate the legal issues arising from air pollution and the discharge of toxic and harmful substances caused by ship navigation; The Pollution Prevention and Control Law has been extended to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from ships.

The Government implements the concept of reducing emissions from ships in the process of public procurement. The Norwegian government will promote the inclusion of zero - and low-emission concepts in the procurement process of ferries and high-speed vessels. According to Norwegian legislation on public procurement, public bodies must conduct procurement in a manner that reduces harmful environmental impacts and promotes climate friendliness. The Government hopes that the public sector will use its emission reduction procurement practices to incentivize the use of low-emission technology products, and will ensure that requirements related to zero-emission transport are taken into account in the public procurement process as far as possible, providing opportunities and creating incentives for the development of zero-emission vessels.

The government supports the purchase and registration of green ships in the form of financial and tax incentives. The Norwegian government has developed a long-term subsidy and tax incentive program for the acquisition of environmentally friendly vessels, and the 2019 national budget has set up a special fund to support the introduction of low - and zero-emission solutions for high-speed passenger ships, as well as financial subsidies for the acquisition of environmentally friendly high-speed vessels by local governments. In addition to urging existing ships flying the Norwegian flag to implement green environmental measures, introducing incentives (such as better service, lower fees, etc.) to encourage shipowners to register zero - and low-emission vessels in Norway to enhance the international competitiveness of the Norwegian shipping industry.

The government will work with relevant enterprises to formulate plans for the development of green ships. The Norwegian government believes that the green development of the shipping industry is inseparable from the joint efforts and cooperation of shipowners, shippers and relevant public authorities. In the process of developing the green ship development program, the Norwegian government has engaged in a dialogue with relevant industry partners to discuss the possibility of developing a letter of intent for the green renewal of the cargo fleet; Enterprises are encouraged to support the research and development of relevant technologies and infrastructure construction through donations, such as Enova, a wholly state-owned company under the Royal Norwegian Petroleum Energy Ministry, has allocated 1.5 billion Norwegian kroner for different types of ship projects since 2015, for the installation of batteries and charging facilities for green ships.

Establish shipping quota obligations for biofuels. The Norwegian government believes that increasing the use of biodiesel and biogas is one of the important means to achieve the goal of halving Norwegian shipping emissions by 2030. The Norwegian Parliament has submitted a proposal to the government on the implementation of sustainable biofuel quota obligations for the shipping industry. In this regard, the Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment has organized UNEP to cooperate with the Maritime Administration to examine the feasibility and environmental impact of introducing mandatory measures for biofuel quotas, and to cooperate with scientific research institutions such as the Innovation Agency and the Research Council and related enterprises to increase the research and development and production of biogas from biological residues and wastes.

(2) Japan

Japan, a major player in the global shipping and shipbuilding industry, is working to introduce ultra-low or zero emission ships by 2030, with a view to achieving greenhouse gas emissions reductions of 90% or more (compared to 2008). To this end, Japan is accelerating the research, development and demonstration of new technologies, and formulating measures to encourage the coordinated development of zero-emission ships, clean alternative fuel supply chains and related infrastructure, in order to solve the problems of high initial investment costs, insufficient endurance capacity and lagging construction of related supporting facilities in the promotion and application of green ships as soon as possible.

Japan regards the development of clean alternative fuels as an effective way to promote the development of green ships, and believes that there are two main possibilities for the realization of alternative fuels for shipping ships: First, liquefied natural gas (LNG) fuel is used as a transitional alternative fuel to solve the problem of carbon emission reduction in shipping, and LNG fuel infrastructure is used to gradually expand the use of biological CH4 and carbon cycle CH4. The second is to increase the use of hydrogen and ammonia fuel while using LNG fuel, because the combustion of liquefied hydrogen and ammonia without the use of kindling does not emit CO2, which can play an important role in reducing the total greenhouse gas emissions of international shipping [4].

In order to fully introduce Marine power alternative fuels and related technologies around 2028, Japan has established key pilot projects and research technologies in recent years: First, accelerate the pilot of the dual-fuel internal combustion engine project, by carrying out the trial of the dual-fuel internal combustion engine of conventional fuel and hydrogen/ammonia alternative fuel, to achieve the goal of applying it to small coastal vessels by 2026, and expand the application of the technology to large ocean-going ships with the improvement of the technology; Second, encourage the use of LNG fuel, carbon cycle CH4 fuel, and formulate measures to solve the problem of CH4 escape; The third is to improve the CO2 capture rate, reduce the size, cost and power to optimize the performance of the CO2 capture system on board. Fourth, by enhancing the battery energy density, improve the efficiency of the battery propulsion system and other ways to meet the needs of large ocean-going ships for long endurance.

In practice, Japan is working on the concept design of super ecological ships, developing four types of zero-emission ships (hydrogen fuel ships, ammonia fuel ships, CO2 capture ships, ultra-efficient LNG fuel ships), and exploring the possibility of ecological development of container ships and bulk carriers in the future. The project has clarified the possibility and challenge of introducing zero-emission ships from the technical point of view. While developing the concept design of 80,000 DWT bulk hydrogen fuel ships and 20,000 TEU container hydrogen fuel ships, it has determined the key technical problems to be solved in the development of liquefied hydrogen fuel ships. For example, developing hydrogen fuel engines and fuel supply systems, increasing the size of fuel tanks, strengthening thermal protection systems, and preventing hydrogen leakage. Japan Classification Society tries to improve and enhance the green performance of ships by optimizing ship type, reducing hull friction, improving ship propulsion efficiency, improving waste heat recovery and operational efficiency, etc., and has made certain research progress [6].

(3) The United Kingdom

The UK sees 2020-2030 as a critical period for the breakthrough and development of zero-emission ship technology. From the IMO's initial strategy to achieve zero emissions by 2050, the development of zero-emission vessels must be broken through in the 2020-2030 period, and the next few decades will be based on scale and commercialization, underscoring the urgency to act now. The UK believes that zero-emission ships need to be in service by 2030 and that any ship project planned to be funded, designed or built by 2020 will need to consider switching to non-fossil fuel power supply later in the ship's life [8]. In order to achieve the 2030 ship decarbonisation plan, the UK has developed the following decarbonisation development path: Identify the needs for the development of zero-emission ships in the Low Carbon Action 2050, conduct an industrial feasibility assessment of zero-emission ships, clarify the gap between existing ships and zero-emission ships, compare different decarbonization options, identify the driving factors in the transition to zero-emission ships, and develop a low-carbon action plan to promote the comprehensive development of zero-emission ships.

To drive the adoption of zero-emission vessels, the UK has undertaken a great deal of work in policy, the public domain, standards and rule-making. Enabling shipping policies for 2020-2030 will have a significant impact on the shipping industry by helping it achieve cost-effective decarbonisation targets. Over time, the development of the relevant zero-emission vessel standards may become more stringent to help provide a level playing field, close the competitive gap with traditional fossil fuels and technologies, and promote the adoption of zero-emission vessels. In the development and commercialization of zero-emission ships, the UK attaches great importance to establishing cooperation with international energy developers, fuel technology companies and other industry leaders.

According to the technical maturity of the development of zero-carbon fuels, Lloyd's Register of Shipping assesses the technical bottlenecks of the use of various alternative fuels and proposes solutions; Defines "zero carbon fuels" as all fuels with very low CO2 emissions and the potential to become zero CO2 emissions, and considers that other zero carbon fuels may exist; It is speculated that renewable energy, bioenergy, and fossil fuels containing carbon capture and storage will be the main sources of shipping fuels in the future. Lloyd's Register of Shipping has studied the technology maturity and use of zero-carbon fuel from the aspects of fuel filling, storage, processing, conversion and promotion. It believes that every zero-carbon fuel has shortcomings in use, but some technical bottlenecks have commonalities. It is necessary for industry entities, regulatory agencies and non-governmental organizations to work together to solve problems such as the formulation of fuel filling procedures and quality standards, the storage of new fuel and energy, and the construction of onshore supporting infrastructure [9].

In order to meet the future market demand, Lloyd's Register of Shipping conducted research and judgment on the influencing factors and application feasibility of the development of zero-emission ship technology; By constructing different regulatory and economic scenarios and combining seven viable zero-emission ship technologies (see Table 1) with five ship types (bulk carriers, container ships, tankers, passenger ships, and ro-ro passenger ships), the life cycle of each technology and ship type combination and its revenue capacity and cost impact are assessed. A relatively comprehensive answer to the industry's question about "which zero-emission technologies are best suited for today's conventionally performing ships". According to the survey of stakeholders in the shipping industry, most shipowners believe that the reliability and scalability of zero-emission ship technology are more important than the cost factor, but the cost increase of zero-emission ships should not exceed 10%[10]. To this end, Lloyd's Register of Shipping has specifically analyzed the price factors that affect the construction and operation of zero-emission ships, and concluded that the current scenario of zero emission cannot meet the above requirements, even for advanced biofuels. Although the cost of technology and equipment in the zero-emission transition will gradually decrease with the significant investment in research and development and the improvement of technical readiness, operating costs will always be a constraint to the early market application of zero-emission vessels.

(4) The development of foreign green ships

In order to comply with the development situation of green emission reduction in the international shipping industry, maritime powers have increased investment in the field of green ships, shipping companies have accelerated investment in green ship research and development, shipping companies are also vigorously promoting the green work of ship operations.

In terms of policy guidance, the initial carbon emission reduction targets of IMO in 2030 and 2050 should be set, and medium and long-term development plans for carbon emission reduction of domestic shipping industry should be formulated respectively. Examples include UK Maritime 2050 (2019), Norway's Green Shipping Action Plan (2019), and Japan's Zero-Emissions Shipping Roadmap (2020). Provide corresponding financial support and tax concessions, and actively guide the shipping industry market players, universities, research institutes and other industry units to participate in the technical research and development and production of green ships.

In terms of scientific research, development and application promotion support, green ship technology is listed as a priority development project of the shipbuilding industry, and various research and development units and organizations are encouraged to actively invest in the research and judgment of the scientific and technological development trend of green ships and the improvement of equipment performance, so as to ensure the technological leadership of the country in the field of this industry. For example, NYK Group has developed and designed 80,000 DWT hydrogen fuel bulk carriers, 80,000 DWT ammonia fuel bulk carriers, and ultra-efficient LNG fuel container ships, which have led the development concept of super ecological ships.

Advocate international cooperation and establish international cooperation projects. Through the cooperation with the international industry technology leading enterprises, engineering contractors, core system/module design and manufacturing enterprises, in the accumulation of experience, training talents, while promoting the promotion of international competitiveness and influence. For example, the EU established the LeanShips Innovation Project, which brings together 46 shipbuilders, equipment manufacturers and research institutions in 13 countries to work on eco-friendly shipping technology/all types of zero-emission vessels. It focuses on issues such as ship alternative fuels, ship energy efficiency decision support system, and sulfur emission control area rectification, aiming to achieve the goals of 25% reduction in ship fuel consumption, 25% reduction in CO2 emissions, and zero emissions of SOx, NOx and particulate matter.

Looking at the status quo of international green ship development, the current hot spots of green ship technology mainly focus on the overall optimization of ships and the low carbonization of ship power fuel, supplemented by green ship operation and construction technology. Ship overall optimization technology is mainly embodied in optimizing ship design, new hull materials, reducing ship ballast water, reducing ship resistance and so on. Marine power enhancement technology is mainly developed around the use of new alternative fuels, including gas fuel technology, hybrid/electric propulsion systems, fuel cell technology, engine waste heat recovery, etc. This is also the key technical competition field for China's green ship industry to achieve high-quality development.


  • Omron NS5-MQ00B-V2 Touch Screen HMI
  • Siemens 6DP1280-8AB SIMADYN D Control Module
  • Schneider HJA36060U43X PowerPact H Breaker
  • WITTENSTEIN LP120X-MF2-50-1I1-3X-SPE Planetary Gear
  • Omron G9SX-GS226-T15-RT Safety Guard Relay
  • Omron CPM1A-40CDT1-D-V1 Programmable Controller
  • ABB ACH550-01-05A4-4 HVAC Drive 2.2kW
  • Schneider TSXDMZ28DT Modicon TSX Micro I/O Module
  • Siemens 6DL1131-6BH00-0EH1 ET200SP HA DI Module
  • B&R X20IF10E3-1 PROFINET IO Interface Module
  • Siemens QBE3000-D4 Transmitter
  • Inovance H3U-3624MT PLC Controller
  • Inovance AM600-CPU1608TP PLC Module
  • Omron NS8-TV00B-V2 NS8-TV00B-ECV2 HMI
  • Phoenix ILC 151 ETH PLC Module
  • National Instruments NI-9242 Analog Input Module
  • Fanuc A16B-3200-0521 Main Board
  • NLT NL8060BC26-35F 10.4 LCD Screen
  • Pilz PSEN cs1.1P 540050 Safety Switch
  • Keyence VT-SW4 VT-7SR Touch Panel
  • Siemens 6ES7 131-1BL11-0XB0 Digital Input Module
  • Mitsubishi RJ71EIP91 Ethernet IP Module
  • Siemens 3RW4047-1BB14 Soft Starter 55kW
  • Mitsubishi AJ71C21-A PLC Programmable Controller
  • NL8060BC21-06 8.4 Inch LCD Module
  • Siemens 6ES7215-1HG40-0XB0 PLC S7-1200
  • Siemens 3VA2463-5HL32-0AA0 630A Breaker
  • Saginomiya E-UJ-44030-B Control Board
  • Schmersal MV10H330-11y-M20-1348 Safety Switch
  • Fanuc A16B-1211-0301-04A Control Board
  • Siemens 6SN1123-1AB00-0AA2 LT Module
  • A100005506 Compair Delcos 3100 Control Panel
  • Omron ZFV-CA40 Smart Sensor Amplifier
  • Fanuc A16B-2200-0660 I O Board
  • Omron CJ1W-NC471 Position Control Unit
  • Siemens 6SN1112-1AA00-0AA0 Simodrive PWM Module
  • Mitsubishi GT2708 HMI Touch Panel
  • Siemens 3TK2834-1BB40 Safety Switch
  • INSYS EBW-E100 Industrial Ethernet Router
  • Schneider LC1F400 Contactor TeSys F
  • Mitsui RYP-51 PCB Control Board
  • Tamagawa TS2620N941E172 Encoder
  • Pilz PZE 9 Safety Relay
  • Omron C1000H-CPU01-V1 PLC
  • Siemens 6SL3210-1KE21-3UP1 Frequency Converter
  • Allen-Bradley 440E-L22BNSM Rope Pull Switch
  • ABB CI868K01 Interface Module
  • Stein Sohn E 083.1 PLC Rack
  • Mitsubishi GT2508-VTBD GT2508-VTBA HMI
  • ABB 3BSE018161R1 Module
  • CAREL ASD100 PGD1AY0I00 Operation Panel
  • ABB EK370-40-11 Contactor 220-230V
  • Eaton 9PX1500IRTM UPS 1500VA
  • NCV-20NGNMP Programmable Controller
  • Mitsubishi LE-40MTA-E Tension Controller
  • Fanuc A16B-3200-0429 Control Board
  • Mitsubishi GT2310-VTBA HMI Touch Screen
  • 3A99184G 1C31170G PCB Module Rev 10
  • Schneider 140NOM25200 Modicon Quantum Adapter
  • Mitsubishi NV400-SW 400A Circuit Breaker
  • Applied Materials 0190-51102 Heater Controller
  • Omron C200H-DA003 Analog Output Module
  • Yaskawa JANCD-YCP21-E DX200 CPU Board
  • IAI 12G2-60-250-P-L-C1-SP Intelligent Actuator
  • NLT NL8060BC21-11 8.4 LCD Screen
  • Omron NX502-1300 Controller Unit
  • ABB RVT-6 Power Factor Controller
  • Schneider TM258LF66DT4L PLC Controller
  • NLT NL6448BC26-27D 8.4 LCD Panel
  • NLT NL8060BC21-09 8.4 LCD Screen
  • Keyence XG-8700L Multi-camera Imaging System
  • EPC 50 3183045486 I O Motherboard
  • Nidec Emerson M701-054-00270A CT Drive
  • Therma Wave 18-011040 Controller Assembly
  • Mitsubishi Q03UDECPU PLC CPU Module
  • Allen-Bradley 2002-NX70-MWLINK PLC Module
  • AS-2P-60M-B Industrial PLC Cable
  • Yaskawa JANCD-YCP21-E DX200 CPU Board
  • PASABAN MC-2006 03 CAN PLC Card
  • Mitsubishi RJ71PB91V PROFIBUS DP Module
  • Fanuc A20B-8100-0137 PCB I O Board
  • D0-06DD2-D PLC Module DL06 PLC
  • Kepco BOP100-4M Power Supply Amplifier
  • Allen-Bradley 1785-L60B PLC-5 60 Module
  • Siemens 7MH4900-3AA01 Weighing Module
  • Pilz 773100 PNOZ m1p Safety Controller
  • Omron NS12-TS00B-V2 Graphic Operation Panel
  • EC20-4040BTA Programmable Controller PLC
  • Fanuc A16B-1212-0100-01 Power Unit CNC
  • Siemens 6ES7151-3BB23-0AB0 ET200S Interface Module
  • ATTO Control DU-01 PLC Display System
  • Keyence KV-RC8BXR Programmable Controller
  • Lenze GST04-1GVCK-063C22 Servo Motor
  • CKD AX9000GH AX9210H Control Unit
  • ABB PG6310 DC Trigger Control Board
  • Cutler Hammer 10316H621C Type L Device
  • TAIYO AA-277 EM CY TRIP PCB Card
  • Schneider BMXCPS2010 PLC Power Supply
  • Schneider TSXMRPC007M PLC PCMCIA Card
  • 101182218 Safety Stop Relay SSW301HV-230V
  • Cutler Hammer 9-1875-3 Size 6 Contactor 480V
  • Nidec UNI3401 Drive Module Control Board
  • Delta AS06XA-A PLC Module Analog Mixed IO
  • Lenze EPL 10201 13408978 Servo Drive 24V DC
  • Sigmatek CCP612-K PLC Module DI DO Module
  • Schneider ATS48D38Q Soft Starter Altistart 48
  • Fanuc A20B-3300-0472 Main CPU Board Series 30i
  • Mitsubishi A171SCPU-S3 Servo CPU Module PLC
  • ABB 1SFL597001R7011 700A 100-250V Soft Starter
  • Yaskawa JANCD-YCP21-E DX200 CPU Control Board
  • Schneider NS630N Circuit Breaker 3P 630A
  • Honeywell DPCB21010002 Rack Slot PCB
  • Mitsubishi RJ71EIP91 PLC Module
  • Siemens 3VL5763-1DC36-0AA0 Circuit Breaker
  • Siemens 6GK7542-1AX00-0XE0 Communication Module
  • Siemens 6SL3130-6AE15-0AB1 Smart Line Module
  • HMS Anybus AB7646-F Gateway
  • Honeywell 621-0020 Analog Input Module
  • Siemens 6ES7212-1HF40-0XB0 PLC Controller
  • MAK 1.00.7-36.21.00-40 PCB Module
  • ABB 3BSE006503R1 PFSA140 Power Supply
  • SAACKE F-GDSA 143303 Burner Controller
  • ABB PFSC230 25m Cable Set
  • GE HYDRAN 201Ci-1 Controller
  • ABB NINT-42C main circuit interface board
  • B&R 3AT660 6 Thermocouple Input Module
  • Honeywell EC7850A1080 Programmable Logic Controller
  • Mitsubishi A2ACPU21 CPU Module MELSEC A Series