What are the properties of photons and electrons? What the hell do they have to do with each other?

"Electrons can indeed 'become' photons, in two ways. The first is decay, but the process of electron decay is extremely long, scientists have calculated that the electron signature can reach 6.6×10²⁸ years. Second, annihilation occurs when it collides with positrons."

Electrons can become photons, so electrons and photons are not particles of the same volume and mass. If they're the same, why divide them into electrons and photons? If electrons and photons are not the same kind of particles, then there is a difference in volume and mass size. If the electron is a particle larger than the photon, that means that the decomposition of the electron can be decomposed into its own smaller photons. If this is the case, it contradicts the previous statement that the electron is an indivisible elementary particle. Thus, an electron is a particle larger in volume and mass than a photon, and is a particle that can be decomposed into at least two photons by decomposition. If the decomposition of the electron is regarded as the decay of the electron, then the "decay-decomposition" of the electron is not 6.6×10²⁸ years calculated by scientists, but is completed in an instant. Looking at how the electric particles in the current are instantly decomposed into light and heat (the presence of independent hot particles) after colliding with the tungsten wire in the bulb, and how the electrons in the current are instantly decomposed into heat (the presence of independent hot particles) in the motor, we can see how unreasonable it is that the electron decay takes 6.6×10² years. Moreover, the annihilation of electrons does not come to nothing. The annihilation of electrons is the decomposition of electrons, is the decomposition of electrons to constitute the independent state of the hot particles, is the independent state of the hot particles to reflect the existence of the annihilation of electrons, is the independent state of the hot particles to reflect the law of material immortality.

Science popularization is a very good social affairs and social work. However, if science popularization is only the unchanging existing scientific knowledge, the unmodified and unevolved existing scientific knowledge, or even the self-contradictory and wrong existing scientific knowledge, it can only solidify the status of existing scientific knowledge and strengthen the consciousness of existing scientific knowledge in people's minds. Even if it solidifies the status of wrong scientific knowledge and strengthens the consciousness of wrong scientific knowledge in people's minds, it will constitute a kind of resistance to correct correction and reasonable progress of scientific knowledge, will constitute a rejection of newly created reasonable and correct scientific thoughts and views, and will play a kind of counter-effect to hinder scientific progress.

Therefore, when people do the beautiful business of popular science, they should express the traditional existing knowledge and the scientific thoughts and opinions that are different from the traditional existing knowledge at the same time, so that people who receive popular science publicity and popular science education can think, compare, judge and choose by themselves. Doing science popularization in this way should be conducive to people's independent thinking, should be conducive to the promotion of correct and reasonable scientific thoughts and scientific viewpoints, and should be conducive to promoting scientific progress.