Welcome to the Industrial Automation website!

NameDescriptionContent
HONG  KANG
E-mail  
Password  
  
Forgot password?
  Register
当前位置:

How big is the pressure on carbon emissions in the chemical industry?

来源: | 作者:佚名 | 发布时间 :2023-11-28 | 346 次浏览: | Share:

The total carbon emissions of the chemical industry are limited but the intensity is outstanding: at present, China's annual carbon dioxide emissions reach 10 billion tons, of which the chemical industry emissions are less than 500 million tons, far less than the major emissions of electricity, steel, cement, etc., from the total point of view, the chemical industry is not the first to bear the brunt. However, from the perspective of intensity, the emission per unit income of chemical industry is higher than the average level of industrial industry; In addition, different regions face differentiated pressure due to different economic structure, energy structure and development level. In the process of decomposition of total emission control targets in regional and industry dimensions, the chemical industry may face development shackles from carbon emissions in some regions.

Industrial process emissions are important sources of carbon emissions: carbon emissions can be roughly divided into two categories from the generation mechanism, energy-related emissions and industrial process emissions. The former is mainly the carbon emissions caused by the direct combustion of fossil energy; The latter is not related to energy consumption, but to emissions from specific chemical reactions, such as the decomposition of limestone in the production of cement glass, and the conversion of synthetic gas to hydrogen. With the advancement of renewable energy alternatives in the future, energy-related emissions will be greatly reduced, and process emissions may become the core factor determining the carbon emission pressure of products. At present, the process emission of cement accounts for about 75% of the total process emission in China and is the main source of process emission. However, the unit process emissions of the chemical industry can not be underestimated, the process emissions of carbon 1 and carbon 2 main products can reach more than 50% of the whole process emissions, and its core comes from the conversion process of hydrocarbon, that is, the reaction of CO and water to produce hydrogen, and the disadvantage of coal with the lowest hydrogen content is the most obvious. One ton of coal-based olefin process emissions can reach 6 tons of CO2, if the current EU price of 40 euros/ton of CO2 emissions will be internalized, will account for nearly 20% of the product price. Because of the "defects" of the raw materials themselves, the coal chemical industry has the "original sin" of high emissions, which can also explain why the market listed the coal chemical industry as the object of supply-side reform in the previous period. However, we believe that the necessity of industrial upgrading under carbon neutrality is beyond doubt, but it is not a stroke of death, and leading enterprises with advance layout to improve efficiency and reduce emissions have sufficient living space and development initiative.

Leading companies have the right to development under the carbon neutral goal: Even without a "carbon neutral" framework, leading companies are actually constantly building a capacity base for reducing consumption and emissions. The problem of emission in the process of energization is actually the utilization rate of carbon atoms, that is, the utilization rate of raw materials; Although it is difficult to reverse the reaction mechanism in the short term from the disadvantages of coal chemical industry, the unnecessary loss of carbon atoms can be minimized by improving the utilization efficiency of materials, including syngas, which comes from a deep understanding of the process. For example, Hualu has realized the high-load and long-period operation of the device, and the interconnection of the three platforms has improved the utilization rate of synthetic gas. For example, Baofeng Energy invested 1.4 billion yuan in the construction of solar water electrolysis project last year, coupled with the hydrogen demand of coal chemical industry to reduce process emissions. Seeing that the measures taken by advanced enterprises are not aimed at the current policy, but have consciously carried out advance layout, and they are still the most vitality and the right to development in the short, medium and long-term dimension in the future.

1. Chemical industry in the context of carbon neutrality

Carbon neutrality is undoubtedly one of the most topical topics in the capital markets these days. In fact, the proposal and landing of China's carbon reduction target is not a sudden attack, but has experienced a continuous process of advancement. "Reaching the peak" is not achieved overnight, and "neutralization" is not built in a day. In 2009, China for the first time put forward the quantitative target of reducing carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP by 40% to 45% in 2020 compared with 2005. From intensity targets to total targets, from peak to net zero, the evolution of emission reduction targets to higher levels of difficulty has witnessed China's long-term and sustained investment in addressing climate change. In September 2020, at the General debate of the 75th session of the United Nations General Assembly, China put forward the goal of reaching a carbon peak by 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2060. This is not only China's solemn commitment to shoulder the responsibility of a major country to achieve the ambitious goal of addressing climate change and leading global climate governance, but also has a profound impact on the development trend of domestic industry and investment logic. The benefits of carbon neutrality on emerging industries, including new energy, are simple to understand, but the impact on traditional industries is difficult to generalize, especially for the high-energy-consuming industry in the traditional sense of chemical industry, which is interpreted by the market as another round of supply-side reform, but who is the object of "reform"? Especially recently, Inner Mongolia announced that in addition to some exempted projects, it will no longer approve modern coal chemical projects during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, which has intensified the market's concerns about the future of the chemical industry, especially the coal chemical industry. We believe that the characteristics of carbon emissions in the chemical industry can be summarized as follows: 1) the total amount of emissions is limited but the intensity is prominent. 2) The emission pressure of coal chemical process is relatively large, but leading enterprises with advance layout of efficiency improvement and emission reduction have sufficient living space and development initiative.

2. Characteristics and accounting methods of chemical carbon emissions

At present, China's annual carbon dioxide emissions have reached 10 billion tons, and the carbon emissions of the chemical industry (petroleum processing and coking industry and chemical raw materials and chemical products manufacturing) are less than 500 million tons, far less than the major emissions of electricity, steel, cement, etc., that is to say, from the total point of view, chemical industry is not the first industry. However, from the perspective of intensity, the carbon emission per unit income of chemical industry is higher than the average level of industrial industry; And different regions due to the different economic structure, energy structure and development level, face differential pressure, so that the chemical industry in some areas may meet the development of carbon emissions shackles.

2.1 Limited total emissions

First of all, from the perspective of the total carbon emissions of the whole society, the total global carbon dioxide emissions in 19 years reached 34.2 billion tons, and China's emissions reached 9.8 billion tons. With China's economic development, the proportion of China's carbon emissions has increased simultaneously, especially after China's accession to the WTO, the growth rate of emissions has reached an inflection point, and the growth rate is 2.5%, faster than the global average. At present, China accounts for nearly 30% of global emissions, and has become the world's largest carbon emission country. China's achievements in building a moderately prosperous society in an all-round way and eliminating poverty are obvious to all, but the issue of carbon emissions has always been the focus of the tussle between China and Western developed countries over the right to future development. In this context, China's initiative to peak and net zero, the necessity and foresight of grasping the initiative of climate management is obvious.

From the mechanism of carbon emissions, emissions can be roughly divided into two categories: energy-related emissions and industrial process emissions. The former is easier to understand, the main thing is the carbon emissions caused by the direct combustion of fossil energy, according to the different accounting boundaries will also include the emissions of purchased electricity and heat; The latter has nothing to do with energy consumption, but the emissions generated by specific chemical reactions, such as limestone decomposition and escape in the production of cement glass, metal smelting, synthetic gas conversion to hydrogen production, etc., of which cement production process emissions account for about 75% of China's total industrial process emissions.

From the perspective of China's primary source of carbon emissions, coal accounts for 75% of the share, followed by oil, process emissions and natural gas. From the perspective of primary energy consumption structure, coal accounts for only 58%, indicating that the unit emission intensity of coal is also higher than the average water level of primary energy. The resource situation of "rich coal, less oil and gas shortage" and the high unit emissions of coal have led to the downstream coal industry becoming the focus of China's carbon reduction work.

Based on the highly authoritative CEADS database of the academic community, we analyzed the emission structure of domestic sub-sectors. The original data package included 47 national economic industries, 17 fossil energy combustion emissions and 1 process emissions. It is worth mentioning that for process emissions, the CEADS database only considers the emissions related to cement production, while the process emissions caused by fossil energy input conversion are mainly included in the energy source correlation. From the perspective of the terminal sector that produces carbon emissions, the carbon emissions of China's industrial sector (excluding the power and heat sector) in 2017 were 3.67 billion tons, accounting for 39% of the total emissions, and it is the second largest carbon emission industry after the power and heat field. Further within the industry sector, the carbon emissions of the chemical industry (petroleum processing and coking industry + chemical raw materials and chemical products manufacturing) are about 400 million tons, accounting for only 10.2% of the total industrial emissions and 4% of the total domestic emissions. Carbon emissions in the industrial field are mainly from non-metallic minerals and ferrous metal smelting, which directly accounts for 78% of the total industrial carbon emissions and 30% of the total domestic carbon emissions.

At the same time, combined with the energy structure of carbon emissions and downstream consumption, coal consumption as the main carbon emissions, 73% of its energy consumption is used for electricity and steel, and chemical consumption only accounts for 8%. The proportion of chemical industry in the downstream consumption structure of crude oil and natural gas is 49% and 10%. Therefore, from the perspective of the total emission and proportion of the national dimension, the emission contribution of the chemical industry is very limited.

2.2 Prominent emission intensity

Although from the national dimension, the total carbon emission contribution of the chemical industry is not large, but at the regional level, due to the difference in regional economic structure, energy structure and development level, it still faces differential pressure. In particular, Inner Mongolia, a large coal province, was criticized in February by the National Development and Reform Commission for failing to complete the "dual control" assessment of total energy consumption and intensity. Based on the above-scale income and energy consumption of industry and its subdivision chemical industry in the statistical yearbook of some provinces and cities, we simply calculated the energy consumption and carbon emissions corresponding to each 10,000 yuan income.

The carbon emissions per unit of energy consumption were calculated by using the consumption ratio of coal, crude oil and natural gas in each province and city to establish the conversion from energy consumption data to carbon emissions. Based on the newly released indicators of energy consumption reduction rate per 10,000 yuan of regional GDP by province (autonomous region and city), we selected the three worst-performing provinces and cities (Inner Mongolia, Ningxia and Liaoning) and the three best-performing provinces and cities (Beijing, Hebei and Gansu), and compared them with the national estimated data. First, from the perspective of unit emissions of the industry, the carbon emissions per unit income of the chemical industry are higher than the average level of the industrial industry. Secondly, in terms of regional differences, for provinces and cities with poor performance of 10,000 yuan energy consumption index, the carbon emission cost per unit income is also significantly higher. Therefore, from the perspective of emission intensity, the chemical industry still faces certain challenges in emission reduction, and the regional differences are very obvious.

2.3 Carbon emission measurement methods of chemical products

In general, the chemical industry emissions have the characteristics of limited total amount but outstanding intensity. And because of the wide range of products in the chemical industry, clearing the core processes that generate carbon emissions is important to identify future risks and opportunities. The first step is to identify the sources and accounting methods of carbon emissions in the chemical industry. The establishment of our carbon emission inventory is based on algorithms rather than online monitoring and is consistent with the international standards of the IPCC. According to China's official carbon emission accounting guidelines, the sources of carbon emissions in chemical production can be mainly subdivided into five aspects, which are fuel combustion emissions, exhaust gas flare combustion emissions, industrial production process emissions, CO2 recovery and utilization, and CO2 emissions implicit in net purchased electricity and heat. In this paper, emissions from fuel combustion and implicit emissions from net purchased electricity and heat are classified as emissions from public works, emissions from industrial production processes are listed separately, and emissions from flare combustion of waste gas and CO2 recovery and utilization (except synthetic urea consumption) are not considered.

2.3.1 Discharge from utility projects

The utility project emissions of chemical enterprises are mainly energy-related emissions. Energy consumption in the production process can be primary energy and secondary energy sources. Different fuels emit different amounts of carbon during combustion. Electricity is a secondary energy, but because the process of generating electricity still requires the fuel combustion of the power plant, in the accounting guide, electricity also has a carbon emission coefficient, in this paper we use the Beijing 2020 new standard 0.604 tons of CO2/MWh calculation. Generally, we refer to fuel combustion emissions, electric/thermal implied carbon emissions and torch combustion emissions as utility emissions. In this paper, we focus on the calculation of fuel combustion and electric/thermal implied carbon emissions.

2.3.2 Emissions from industrial processes

The calculation of process carbon emissions is based on the principle of conservation of material mass. The 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories assume that all the C element lost in process emissions is converted into CO2 emission. The carbon content difference between raw materials and products (including secondary products) is the CO2 emission during the production of the product. Process emissions and utility emissions together make up all carbon emissions from chemical preparation.

In addition, since overseas oil and gas routes are mainly used, the process is mature and there are complete process emission data, so we can directly use the IPCC and EU published oil and gas route emission factors to directly calculate. For important coal chemical routes in China, we will supplement the more detailed carbon emission calculation process.

3. Carbon emission calculation of typical chemical products

In this chapter, we will calculate the unit carbon emissions of several important types of chemical products in more detail to sort out the main sources of carbon emissions in major chemical production processes and chemical products with high environmental costs. The three paths are mainly competitive in the fields of C1 and C2. C3 is mainly propylene, similar to C2 ethylene is no longer a single column. For the two core sources of carbon emissions, energy-related emissions can be significantly reduced or even reduced to zero through power substitution in the future, but process emissions are different due to the reaction mechanism and conversion efficiency. The carbon emission caused by hydrocarbon conversion is the most important process emission in the production process of chemical products.

3.1 How to understand the process emissions of energy chemical industry

Because coal is mainly composed of carbon elements, the hydrogen-carbon molar ratio is only about 0.2 to 1, and a part of C needs to be sacrificed to replace hydrogen from other raw materials, and the carbon conversion rate is not as good as oil and gas. From the point of view of the specific reaction process, coal is converted into gas through the coal gasification process and then the subsequent preparation task. In an ideal water-gas preparation reaction, one part of C and water becomes one part of CO and hydrogen. However, this reaction process is a strong endothermic reaction, which does not exist alone in the actual coal gasification process, but must be combined with another carbon oxidation exothermic reaction to heat this process. These exothermic reactions consume C, but do not displace an equal proportion of hydrogen from the water molecules, resulting in a final product with a hydrogen ratio greater than 1, and even some CO2. In addition, taking methanol, an important chemical intermediate product, as an example, the ratio of hydrocarbon in its raw material is as low as 0.5, and the consumption of hydrogen is significantly greater than that of CO. Therefore, a conversion reaction is often added after the coal gasification process to adjust the ratio of CO and hydrogen. In this process, one part of CO and water molecules are consumed, and one part of hydrogen and CO2 are produced. These are the main sources of CO2 process emissions in coal chemical routes. On the other hand, the hydrogen-carbon ratio of oil is 1.6-2, the hydrogen-carbon ratio of natural gas is above 2, and the hydrogen content is significantly higher than that of coal. Taking the C1 chemical industry of natural gas as an example, because the hydrogen carbon ratio of methane itself reaches 4, from the core reaction equation, the ratio of H2 and CO generated by the first step of steam reforming to synthesis gas is as high as 3 times, which is far greater


  • GE HYDRAN 201Ti Single Channel Gas Monitoring Transmitter
  • GE Hydran M2-X Transformer Online Monitoring Equipment
  • GE Hydran M2 Transformer Monitoring System
  • Kollmorgen Seidel 65WKS-CE310/6PB - Servo Drive Control
  • Kollmorgen U9M4T - Servodisc DC Motor, With Harmonic Drive Transmission
  • KOLLMORGEN TT-2952-1010-B - INLAND BRUSH SERVO MOTOR WITH TACH
  • ONE VF-RA2474N-5/10/12/15 - Servo Drive Power Cable
  • Kollmorgen S30601-NA - Servostar 346 + EtherCat
  • Kollmorgen HDIL100P1 - Direct Drive Linear Hall Effect Assembly
  • Kollmorgen TT-4239-1010-AA - DC Servo Motor 875 RPM
  • PMI Kollmorgen 00-00907-999 - ServoDisc DC Motor 0.5" Diameter Shaft
  • INLAND KOLLMORGEN TT-2952-1010-B - MOTOR (USES RESOLVER)
  • KOLLMORGEN CTI-187-2 - BRUSHLESS MOTOR DANAHER MOTION
  • Kollmorgen 12-0857 - Lead Screw Electric Cylinder without Motor
  • Kollmorgen AKM13C-ANCNR-00 - Servo Motor
  • kollmorgen 6sm, 10m - Cable
  • KOLLMORGEN ME2-207-C-94-250 - GOLDLINE SERVOMOTOR-ENCODER COMMUTATED
  • Kollmorgen MT308A1-R1C1 - GoldLine Motor
  • Kollmorgen 73 & 54 cm Travel - Ironless Linear Motors on THK Rail
  • Kollmorgen AKM53H-ACCNR-00 - Servo Motor
  • Kollmorgen PA5000 - Power Supply
  • KOLLMORGEN D082M-12-1310 - GOLDLINE DDR DIRECT DRIVE ROTARY MOTOR 230Vrms 300 RPM
  • Kollmorgen RBEH-01210-A14 - Brushless Motor, Heidenhain D-83301
  • KOLLMORGEN Servotronix PRD-CC18551H-11 - Servo Board
  • Kollmorgen DH083M-13-1310 - Ho Direct Drive Rotary. Max Speed: 400/500 RPM
  • KOLLMORGEN BMHR-4.8XX - INLAND MOTOR
  • Kollmorgen Seidel 84421 - Motor Cable 20 Metre 6SM 27/37 AKM DBL Engines
  • Kollmorgen AKD1207-NBCC-0000 - Drive
  • HP Indigo / Kollmorgen VLM32H-ALNR-00 - Motor
  • SUPERIOR ELECTRIC / KOLLMORGEN GM05009005 - POWERSTAT 50 AMP VARIAC w/ PMI MOTOR
  • Kollmorgen CM12A1-015-033-00 - MOTOR CABLE for AKD B/P/T/M Motor AKM 1-7 Cable
  • Kollmorgen U9M2 - DC Motor
  • Kollmorgen AKM11C-ANMN2-00 - 3-Phase PM Servo Motor 110W
  • Kollmorgen 60-023168-000 - MOTOR GEARBOX ASSEMBLY SERVODISC DC NO REAR SHAFT
  • Kollmorgen AS10300 - servo drive servo star Cincinnati
  • Kollmorgen AKM23D-EFC2C-00 - Servo Motor AKD Drive
  • KOLLMORGEN E33HRFB-LNK-NS-01 - STEPPER MOTOR 2.7AMP 251W 1500RPM 170V
  • Kollmorgen AKM21G-ENM2DB00 - Servomotor
  • KOLLMORGEN SERVO STAR 620-AS - 230-480V 20A Servo Drive
  • Kollmorgen CFE0A1-002-006-00 - Encoder Cable 6.00m
  • KOLLMORGEN AKM21C-ANM2DBOO - PM SERVOMOTOR
  • Kollmorgen 03200-2G205A - ServoStar Servo Drive
  • Kollmorgen CR10251 - SERVOSTAR CD AC Servo Driver
  • Kollmorgen VF-DA0474N-03-0 - 10 Ft Feedback Cable
  • KOLLMORGEN AKM21S-ANMNR-03 - Servo Motor
  • Danaher Motion Kollmorgen S403AM-SE - Servostar 443M-S Servo Drive
  • Kollmorgen Seidel digifas 7204 - Servo Amplifier Digital
  • Kollmorgen Industrial Drive B-406-B-A1-B3 - Goldline Brushless Servomotor
  • Danaher Motion S20630-CNS - Servo Kollmorgen S200 Series
  • KOLLMORGEN B-206-A-31-B3 - GOLDLINE BRUSHLESS PM SERVO MOTOR 1400RPM
  • Kollmorgen Seidel SR6-6SMx7 - 4m Cable
  • Cincinnati Milacron Kollmorgen Vickers PSR4/5-250-7500 - Power Supply
  • Kollmorgen AKM 13C-ANCNR-00 - Gripper Handling with Neugart PLE 40 gears
  • Kollmorgen SERVOSTAR 403 A-P - 3a servo drive
  • KOLLMORGEN S6M4H - INDEXER ASSY SERVO MOTOR
  • SERVOMOTOR KOLLMORGEN SEIDEL 6SM 57M-3.000-G-09 - Servo Motor
  • Kollmorgen VP-507BEAN-03 - Valueline AKD 10 Ft Power Cable
  • KOLLMORGEN 28454 - SERVO DRIVE, SERVOSTAR 300 SERVOSTAR 310
  • KOLLMORGEN TT-4205-4017-C - INDUSTRIAL DRIVE DC MOTOR
  • Kollmorgen T150551 - Servostar 343 Control Drive
  • Kollmorgen ICD05030A1C1 - Platinum DDL Direct Drive Linear Motor w/ 30" Rail Way
  • Kollmorgen SERVOSTAR 303 S30361-SE - Servo Drive
  • Kollmorgen 00-00907-002 - ServoDisc DC Motor Varian Semiconductor 3500054
  • Kollmorgen CM12A1-025-005-00 - MOTOR CABLE for AKD B/P/T/M Motor AKM 1-7 Cable
  • KOLLMORGEN MOTION TECH IL18100A3TRC1 - BRUSHLESS LINEAR MOTOR PLATINUM DDL
  • Kollmorgen SERVOSTAR 406 M-C - Servo Drive FW: 7.36
  • Kollmorgen IC11030A1P1103 - platinum direct drive linear motor
  • W&T 10/100BaseT - Com Server Highspeed 3×RS232/RS422/RS485
  • Kollmorgen S30361-NA - drive brand
  • Kollmorgen Industrial Drives PSR3-208/50-01-003 - Power Supply
  • Kollmorgen RBE-03011-A00 - Brushless Frameless Servo Motor, OD: 5-5/64"/129mm
  • Industrial Drives SBD2-20-1101-5301C2/160-20 - Servo Amplifier Board For Parts
  • Industrial Drives SBD2-20-1101-5301C2/160-20 - Servo Amplifier Board For Parts
  • Industrial Drives SBD2-20-1101-5301C2/160-20 - Servo Amplifier Board For Parts
  • Kollmorgen IC44030A2P1 - LINEAR DRIVE MOTOR
  • KOLLMORGEN AKM22E-ANS2R-02 - servo motor + Micron X-TRUE 60
  • Kollmorgen 18442-01B - Pendant (E2)
  • Kollmorgen AKD-P00306-NBEC-0069 - Drive
  • Kollmorgen AKM53H-ACCNR-00 - Servomoteur
  • Kollmorgen AKD-P01207-NACN-0056 - Servo Drive
  • Kollmorgen SERVOSTAR 403a-c - Servo Drive
  • Kollmorgen B-204-B-39-016 - Servo Motor
  • Giddings & Lewis Dahaner Motion Kollmorgen M.1017.3140 R3 - Output Module
  • Kollmorgen KNSG300 - Emergency Light Unit
  • KOLLMORGEN 62-0050 Model T31V-EM-C0 - Servo Motor Shaft Size 3/8" Dia 1-1/4" Long
  • Kollmorgen S30601-NA-ARM9 - SERVOSTAR346 Controller w/o Fan As Is
  • Kollmorgen PMI Motors 00-00903-010 - ServoDisc DC Motor Type U9M4H 1/2" shafts
  • Kollmorgen PMI Motion U12M4 - Servo Disc DC Motor Universal Instruments 11467000
  • Kollmorgen AKM53H-accnr-00 - Servo Motor
  • DANAGER MOTION / KOLLMORGEN ACD4805-W4 - (70A ) Vehicle / Motor Controller
  • Kollmorgen s60300 - SERVOSTAR 603 3 x 230-480v 2kva
  • KOLLMORGEN B-404-C-21 - GOLDLINE BRUSHLESS P.M. SERVOMOTOR
  • Kollmorgen T-5144-A - GE Aviation 739034-01 Direct Drive DC Torque Motor
  • KOLLMORGEN M.1302.8761 - CABLE, POWER
  • Kollmorgen CE03250 - Servostar Servo Drive
  • Kollmorgen K-342 - dual axis automatic autocollimator
  • Kollmorgen TT-4500-1010-B - Inland Motor
  • Kollmorgen S20260-Srs - Synqnets200 Series Servo Drive Forparts
  • Kollmorgen PRDRHP720SND-65 - drive CR06703-R
  • KOLLMORGEN S70362-NANANA - driver
  • Kollmorgen CR06260-000000 - SERVOSTAR CD AC Servo Driver
  • KollMorgen akd-m00306-mcec-D000 - Multi-Axis Master Programmable Drive AKD PDMM
  • KOLLMORGEN S61000 - SERVOSTAR 610 3X230-480V 10A
  • Kollmorgen AKD-P00306-NBCC-0000 - AKD Servo Drive
  • KOLLMORGEN CP306250 - SERVOSTAR SP Servo Drive
  • Kollmorgen MPK411 - controller
  • Kollmorgen S64001 - SERVOSTAR 640, factory-certified
  • Kollmorgen Servotronix Prdr0087006Z-00 - Lvd Servo Drive
  • Kollmorgen AKD-P00306-NAAN-0000 - Servo Drive Controller, 1.2KVA, 240Vac, 3 Phase
  • Kollmorgen MCSS08-3232-001 - MCSS06-3224-001 ServoStar Drives (AS-IS)
  • Kollmorgen CR06250-2D063A - drive
  • YASKAWA SGDP-04APA - SERVOPACK SERVO DRIVE
  • Kollmorgen s62001 - servostar 620-as 14kva 20a ip2o 3x 230-480v
  • Kollmorgen Seidel S60100 - Servostar 601 Servo Drive
  • KOLLMORGEN CR06703-R - HP SERVOSTAR CD CONTROLLER
  • kollmorgen Prdr0052200z-05 - graco inter Servo Component
  • KOLLMORGEN S403AM-SE - drive SERVOSTAR 443M-S
  • YASKAWA SGDP-01APA - SERVOPACK SERVO DRIVE
  • Kollmorgen CE06200-1H348H - SERVOSTAR CD Servo Driver
  • Kollmorgen S71262-NANANA - S700 Servo Amplifier 208Y/120V 480Y/277V
  • Kollmorgen S70302-NANANA-NA - S700 Servo Driver
  • KOLLMORGEN S61401-560 - ATS-SERVOSTAR 614-AS Servo Drive
  • KOLLMORGEN Industrial Drives BDS4A-103J-0001/102A21P - Servo Controller
  • Kollmorgen S71202-NANANA-NA-024 - S700 Servo Driver
  • KOLLMORGEN S70302-NANANA - driver
  • Kollmorgen CR06250 - SERVOSTAR Servo Drive
  • Kollmorgen CE03550 - drive
  • Kollmorgen S71202-NANANA - S700 Servo Driver